>From my previous message: I am not really sure that it is such a great idea to have `define-minor-mode' and `define-generic-mode' spew out all these automatic defcustoms, but given that they do that, it seems rather strange and inconsistent that `define-derived-mode' does not.
On second thought, I now believe that the above is a bad idea. It is an incompatible change. People may already have hand defined defcustoms for these modes and making define-derived-mode construct them automatically would lead to competing defcustoms, which would be very bad. Sincerely, Luc. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
