Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Fine, but as long as noone changes call-process to do something > meaningful when requested to execute a file which is only available > via a file-name-handler, I think we should stick to 1 because I > think it's more important to match the behavior of call-process (as > I wrote in the comment). > > But, really, this is all academic anyway since I don't know of anyone who > has funny file-name-handled directories on her exec-path.
M-x eshell RET Welcome to the Emacs shell /tmp $ cd /fencepost.gnu.org: /ssh:fencepost.gnu.org:/home/d/dak $ echo "\input story \bye" >junk.tex /ssh:fencepost.gnu.org:/home/d/dak $ tex junk /ssh:fencepost.gnu.org:/home/d/dak $ cat junk.log This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.4.5) (format=tex 2005.4.18) 11 MAY 2005 19:44 **junk (./junk.tex (/usr/share/texmf/tex/plain/base/story.tex [1]) ) Output written on junk.dvi (1 page, 668 bytes). /ssh:fencepost.gnu.org:/home/d/dak $ -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
