Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Doesn't the following work? > >> (defvar in-my-filter-p nil) > >> (defun my-filter (proc text) >> (let ((in-my-filter-p t)) >> ...)) > >> (defun my-after-change-function () >> (if in-my-filter-p >> ... > > No, because the after-change-function is generic
I would expect it to be buffer local, and as such, it would only be triggered by filter functions that update that buffer. > and doesn't know about all > the various filter functions it might interact with (which it'd have to > tweak with defadvice in order to do what you suggest). Of course, if the after-change-function _is_ generic, that would be necessary. > > My guess is that after-change-function is the wrong place to do what the OP > wants to do. It does indeed seem odd that the after-change-function need to know what command made the change... -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
