> How about if you do whatever is best so as to use the best possible names
> in each function?
OK. That's even better. assuming there's no interest in maintaining
absolute argument-name consistency between functions (which doesn't
exist now, to be fair).
There is no need for "absolute argument-name consistency".
However, coherence between functions is one factor in what
makes any particular argument name better or worse.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
