> Is this just a typo in this mail? > > 2>&1 looks right to me, but according to "man bash" 2&>1 is preferred.
Yes, a typo. I use 2>&1 on both. On 4NT,
echo test 2&>1
would echo "test 2" and create an empty file named "1".
--
/L/e/k/t/u
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
