Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhas you're saying that the mh-e group is intended as an alias for > the mh group. Is that what you really want? We could arrange some way > of doing that.
That's correct. We would not want both "mh" and "mh-e" to appear in the "mail" group. However, I have not heard any reason why we shouldn't just rename the "mh" group to "mh-e" and drop the alias so I've done that. At least with completion, someone who enters just "mh" can discover that the group is actually called "mh-e". This is not true in reverse which is why the alias was created. Since our next MH-E release is to be a major one, we can afford to make such a change. If a defgroupalias function is created, then we can use it to create a "mh" alias. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
