> In general, the only time something is really not visible to users
> is when it is internal to one program.
I suppose that is one way to see it, yes. But using md5 or other
checksum/hash ways to encode names of temporary files is hardly new
(though I suppose you'll say it is not new, but it *is* wrong
nonetheless :)
But the point is moot. Does anyone object to the version of
thumbs-thumbname I proposed a few messages ago, where the resulting
filename is very much like the one it generates now, but valid and
with a sxhash checksum added to it to make collisions less likely?
--
/L/e/k/t/u
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
