Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My two big questions are: 1) Is anyone against this, and why? > > Sometimes in the past, a MH-E developer would _try_ something, possibly > a new way of handling something. He would check the new code into CVS > and it might break the codebase a little while it was being finalized, > but it was checked in so other developers could try it out and give > feedback. I wouldn't feel comfortable doing this anymore knowing that > I'm affecting Emacs for a far greater number of users.
Good observation. Note that we are not affecting Emacs users who do not use MH-E. Perhaps the Emacs developers and users who check out CVS Emacs who use MH-E are also comfortable with this. It is extremely rare. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
