Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Maybe other users have a different experience, but for me 99% of the > > time I would like undo info after a revert is when revert was invoked > > by VC/pcl-cvs after a commit. > > So from this users point of view if VC/pcl-cvs were not to revert the > > buffer, saving undo after revert would not be missed much. > > Indeed, it may also be useful to allow the revert-undoability to be > specified on a revert-by-revert basis. And VC/PCL-CVS would be well served > by a "revert carefully" which would do something like "diff+patch" rather > than an actual revert. Note that revert already does a limited form of > diff+patch since it checks the prefix&suffix of the file/buffer which hasn't > changed, so if only one line was changed the undo would record only > a one-line change rather than a complete delete+insert of the whole buffer.
If saving undo after revert is not implemented/accepted would it be possible to avoid the revert if it is not needed after a commit? Wouldn't a (string= (md5 FILE) (md5 BUFFER)) be enough to avoid reverting? _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
