Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 6/4/05, Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Considering that you want lisp/mh-e to notify both mh-e-devel and
> > emacs-commit, this is currently not possible in the current setup,
> > mainly because CVS's loginfo only matches one configuration file line,
> > and each line call our notification script that only accept 1 e-mail
> > address per kind of notifications (diff / nodiff).
> 
> As a work-around, you could have it send to an alias (I mean one in
> /etc/aliases or equivalent) which in turn just forwards to both lists.

That's true. What might be a better alternative is that I could (and
probably should) set up an mh-e-commits mailing list. I'd add
emacs-commits to that list.

At first I thought that the Emacs folks would not really be interested
in seeing the MH-E commits, but perhaps that would not be the case.

However, if the Emacs maintainers don't even *want* to have an
emacs-commits mailing list, then this is a moot point. Do they?

-- 
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.


_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Reply via email to