to the following patch? Should it use a different face (note that the
actual face that ends up being used by this code is
`mode-line-inactive', even though the code says MODE_LINE_FACE_ID; I'm
not sure why this is)?
Defaulting to mode-line-inactive seems better than defaulting
mode-line, but if it is implemented this way, there should be a
comment to explain that this code doesn't do what you might have
expected it to do.
However, on principle it seems wrong to use mode-line-inactive
directly. There ought to be a separate named face to control this.
It could default to mode-line-inactive.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
