Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Here is a generic approach (similar to using a display table, >> but without the overhead): > > What overhead? Just for the record, could all you people check the value of > `standard-display-table' in your current Emacs session? My bet is that most > of you have it non-nil already.
It is non-nil here, indeed, but... the whole mess with the C-level escape glyph support code was because RMS rejected the original approach that used the display table... -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
