> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: James Cloos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:38:54 -0400 > > What I meant is that is displays what a user of the linux consoles > expects for underlining, which is a different colour. Ie, it supports > the standard vt100 escape sequence, but the output is not physically > an underline.
Ah, sorry, I misunderstood you. > One issue then is whether emacs should ignore faux underlining > support. Console users will have certain expectations on what > underlining, bold, el al mean that are obviously different than > what users of terminal emulators may expect. I'd certainly > expect emacs to do what all of the other apps do and ignore that > the console emulates underlining via a colour change. If you describe how those other apps do this, perhaps we could do the same in Emacs. > The other issue is how emacs determines that a given term's > underlining support is via real underlines or some alternative > representation and, if the latter, whether colouring text might > collide with the application of the underline attribute. See term.c: Emacs looks at the bits in the value of the "NC" capability of the terminal. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
