Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...] >> Creating that many buffers might cause various sorts of overload >> for Emacs. Can't you use one buffer for all the information, >> and sort it out at the end? [...] > I agree that downloading a lot of files will be silly. Perhaps I will > set up a pool of 20 or so buffers for downloads and block or error > when the pool is exhausted. > > Would that be a good idea? If it's feasible, yes. Even if using 1000 buffers wasn't a problem memory-wise. I much prefer programs that doesn't saturate my net connection completely. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
