"Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As written, the definition misleads people into thinking that Emacs > falls into the same category as VI or Notepad.
emacs seeps into every nook and cranny, first explicitly changing named bits locally, then meta-bits locally, then any bits outside of itself anywhere, then any bits including itself, then finally the perception of all those bits by its users, whether or not any external change is actually involved. people who don't understand this initially do so eventually, although they may not understand their understanding. every motion achieves change (surprisingly :-). thi _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel