Apparently these timings are not very fixed. In a freshly started Emacs, my proposed version took 12 seconds (instead of earlier 23) and the abstract versions 40 seconds (instead of 51). This gives a mysterious gain of 11 seconds for both. But now my proposed version runs 3.33 times faster than the abstract ones, instead of earlier 2.2.
Sincerely, Luc. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
