>> This shows that show-trailing-whitespace is flexible enough to allow >> arbitrary >> customization, but escape-glyph is not. There is a need for a buffer-local >> variable similar to show-trailing-whitespace to enable/disable highlighting >> of control characters and nbsp with escape-glyph face on a per-buffer basis. > > What's wrong with `show-nonbreak-space'?
I thought that two new face variables (e.g. `escape-glyph-face' and `nobreak-space-face') would be useful to imitate buffer-local faces. I guess users might want to use different faces for control characters or nbsp in different buffers, or to set `escape-glyph-face' to the default face to not highlight control characters in some buffers. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
