On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:36:14 -0400, RMS wrote: > Rather than argue about which common CUA name most closely matches > some Emacs function that we feel we need to expose, a way to truly > proper matches would be to think about how we might modify Emacs -- > which we boast to ourselves is so infinitely malleable -- so that it > might present truly CUA-like behavior. > >I agree with Miles about this.
Does that mean that you dis / repudiate Kim's work on CUA-mode? I was not advocating an incompatible change to file-open. Rather I think it is well within the Emacs philosophy to extend file-open so that it could be configured to provide CUA-like semantics. /john _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
