Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The code which sets up the escape mappings for those terminals could >> set up an explicit direct mapping for "escape-sequence -> backtab" >> (bypassing the S-tab step) couldn't they? > > Except that it would not correctly handle the case where the user has bound > S-tab to something.
On those terminals S-tab does not exist, it is recoginized directly as backtab. At least terminfo does not have a way to denote S-tab, only backtab. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
