On 6/29/05, Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yet another variety would be to create a buffer which does have a > file, call it "Unnamed" or some such (i.e., in the default directory), > and if such a file already exists, modify it by attaching something > like a number.
I think the default emacs behavior (if the buffer doesn't have a name, ask for one when saving) is far better. You could create new _buffer_ names like "unnamed" or whatever, but actually setting the _file_ name to that seems harmful. -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel