Juanma Barranquero wrote on 01 Jul 2005 20:01:14 +0200: >> Shouldn't the utf-x files with signature be quite in front of the list >> of detected coding systems? I mean, that's what the signature is good >> for in the first place, right? > > Well, yeah, but FF and FE *are* valid characters in many encodings. > Latin encodings for most european language environments are going to > be higher up the priority list, for example.
Well, a Latin-1 file is quite unlikely to begin with « þÿ » or « ÿþ ». > Are there environments (operating systems, language environments, > whatever) where utf-16 is the norm? I think it's the case on MS Windows. -- Gaëtan LEURENT _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
