"Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Custom themes would be a completely new complex feature, not a bug > fix: > > They ARE a new feature. This feature is already in Emacs, it is > important, and I will not stand for giving up on it. That is the > wrong attitude. > > Would you please work on fixing this? Otherwise we will have to wait > till I have time to do it. You have been doing great so far, whenever > you decide to fix something rather than say it can't be done. > > The implementation, once ready, will need thorough testing > (people writing and using themes). It is impossible to > guarantee a time table. > > I'm not asking for a guarantee, or a time table. I'm just asking > someone to fix this feature to work.
It is a new feature, and I think we currently don't use it ourselves in the sources. Getting a larger tester and developer base for it won't happen without it being in the open in a released version (which it already is in XEmacs, with negligible impact as far as I can see) _and_ being documented as a feature. Yes, we might not get it to work under heavy duty in Emacs-22. But if we don't start the process of making it somewhat usable now, we won't get it finished by Emacs-23 either. Nobody claimed that 22.1 would be the last release of the 22.x series. For new _optional_ features, the goal is to get them in, to get their documentation to a consistent state, and to make a good stab of getting them working as advertised. I should be the last to blame Luc if he decides that his personal tastes, priorities and professional conscience don't lend themselves to this task: it is not nice to feel responsible for code which one considers unclean. And it is always a cheap way out of work to say "you are better suited for it than I am". I don't want to go that route, and I am being much less often helpful than I should because other projects are also demanding of my time and I don't manage them and professional deadlines well. But while I don't want to use this as an excuse for myself, I still want to express my admiration and gratitude about how often Luc comes out with a good analysis and working suggestions and patches for faulty code or documentation that was not written by himself. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel