(add-hook 'emacs-lisp-mode-hook
#'(lambda ()
(turn-on-eldoc-mode)
(unless (assoc-string "cl-indent" load-history) (load
"cl-indent" nil t))
(set (make-local-variable 'lisp-indent-function)
'common-lisp-indent-function)
(setq lisp-indent-maximum-backtracking 10)
(put 'define-derived-mode 'common-lisp-indent-function
'(4 4 4 2 &body))
(put 'if 'common-lisp-indent-function '(nil nil &body))))
I like it. Why isn't this indentation the default for emacs-lisp-mode and
lisp-interaction-mode (and maybe lisp-mode)?
Do most people prefer the first of these? The second seems clearer to me
(list vs function call).
1. '(foo bar and (foo bar
toto) toto)
2. '(foo bar and (foo bar
toto) toto)
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
