>> Why do you think it is a mistake? It doesn't work with `occur-mode-hook'. > > Neither does with `occur-hook'. You have to add > > (lambda () (occur-rename-buffer t))
That's exactly what I tried. With the latest CVS state (add-hook 'occur-hook (lambda () (occur-rename-buffer t))) renames the *Occur* buffer to `*Occur: original-buffer-name*', but (add-hook 'occur-mode-hook (lambda () (occur-rename-buffer t))) produces a name with empty original-buffer-name (i.e. just `*Occur: *'), because `occur-1' sets the value of `occur-revert-arguments' after running `occur-mode-hook', but before `occur-hook'. > to `occur-mode-hook' for it to work. That's why I proposed to add a > new parameter INTERACTIVE-P to `occur-rename-buffer' so it can be just > dropped onto the hook. This would be good, but without adding original-buffer-name to the buffer name, to produce a unique buffer name, the user can simply put (add-hook 'occur-mode-hook 'rename-uniquely) -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
