From: Jason Rumney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You also need to remove the hook whenever Emacs crashes. That is more > difficult, and the reason why I would be reluctant to start playing
Yes, that is very important I guess. Are there not any exception handlers capable of handling this in Emacs? > If my reading of the docs is correct, this will prevent Emacs from > seeing lwindow keys altogether. If you return true from a low level > keyboard hook, you must handle the key inside the hook. Since you want > to use lwindow as a modifier key, you'll then need to handle all the > keys that it modifies in the hook as well, and you'll end up doing all > your own keyboard mapping, as Eli said. Eh, thanks, forgot to send it on. Argumenting is not always easy when you get much resistance. As I said earlier this could perhaps be done with a private message that is the equivalence of WM_KEYDOWN for just <lwindow>. But maybe then the modifiers must be handled as well? Could the message instead just be repackaged and sent on to the emacs keyboard thread for <lwindow>? Does that interfere with message order if SendMessage is used? _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
