Jason Rumney wrote:
I have suggested that there might be too few developers on the w32
side. In that sense it may actually be part of a strategy.
There is no conspiracy here. The number of developers reflects the
number of volunteers.
I am not at all talking about conspiracy. I am trying to tell what I
suspect the current strategy leads to. (I e too few volunteers.) Sorry
if my words where misleading, no insult was meant.
However that was not the main purpose of my message. Please write about
the problem I took up (no emacsclient/server on w32) and possible solutions.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
