Juanma Barranquero wrote:
On 7/31/05, Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just meant that the old declaration could perhaps be an implicit
description.
I don't understand.
Just say what changes would you do to the docstring, and if they're
good, by all means commit them.
I guess I just notice too much details sometimes ;-) But anyhow maybe
it is better just to add a last line instead of my first suggestion
which obviously was not as clear:
OLD-NODISP is just a placeholder making it possible to still use
`defadvice' on the old form.
There is a comment in the code which I think means this.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
