Sun Yijiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think this change is probably not fully tested. When I use the > mule-gbk package and set font for chinese characters, they look so > wide, but when I use "emacs -q" they look nice, make no difference > with previous CVS Emacs. I roll back the src/w32bdf.c to older > version, and everything is OK. I think the change of w32bdf.c should > be reviewed, since this is really a bug.
You seem to be saying that you only see the "bug" when you load mule-gbk, which is not part of Emacs. What does mule-gbk do? Does it perhaps try to work around the previous bug by doubling the width of Chinese characters? _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
