> It occurs to me that if there isn't a release until 2006 (or later!) then
> all the files will need to be changed again. Now that the legal advice
> suggests a straightforward solution perhaps this process could
> (ultimately) be scripted.
Note that it doesn't say that we necessarily need to add the subsequent
years after the latest change.
What does "subsequent years after the latest change" mean?
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
