Drew Adams wrote:
> The idea of using an E on a gnu is ok semantically. Whether it looks
> better than just an E, I am not sure.
Attached is an idea ;-) It don't look too bad when resized as a 16x16
icon.
This could make an attractive _logo_, but it would _not_ work as a 16x16
icon, IMO (see attached). Clever combination of E with gnu head - bravo!
But, as Richard pointed out, that makes it hard to distinguish the E.
Let's not forget the story of "The Gnu Who Became a Mushroom" - that's an
invaluable icon lesson. If shrinking a gnu head can turn it into a mushroom,
there is no hope for shrinking E-gnus and other such artistic subtleties. In
particular, shrunken heads seldom appear brilliant.
16x16 is a hard nut to crack.
Maybe it is possible to shrink it. I made several versions of Robs gnu
head in the size of 16x16 (together with M-x).
Here are some variations of Davids suggestion where I have tried to make
the E more visible.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
