James Cloos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (As I see it, the lib's api is such that it can be mapped to lisp w/o > diverging from its C look and feel. Following that api very closely, > then, seems to be the Right Thing To Do. Being able to write all of > the higher-level code using the lib in elisp is enticing.)
how close/far/easy/difficult it is depends on the C library's interface. check out http://www.swig.org for an interface mapping mux approach. it would be cool to see an emacs lisp module for swig. thi _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
