>>Suppose not: Wouldn't that mean `font-lock-lines-before' is useless?
>
>
> Not at all.
Then you mean that `font-lock-lines-before' is useless with jit-lock?
> ... font-lock-lines-before has not been introduced to force
> refontification of the previous lines but because the N previous lines are
> needed as context in order to properly refontify the current line.
> Now the code does in fact refontify the previous lines, but it is
> a side-effect rather than one of the original goals.
>
>
When the "N previous lines" have not been fontified yet because they are
before `window-start' you do have to fontify them anyway. Otherwise any
- syntactical, for example - context infomation needed to fontify the
current line correctly might be invalid.
>>It's not very difficult to contrive test cases for this. By default
>>`font-lock-multiline' is nil. `font-lock-fontify-anchored-keywords'
>>won't alter it - the appropriate lines have been commented out. Write
>>an arbitrary multiline pattern. Now font-lock won't give it the
>>`font-lock-multiline' text property and jit-lock not necessarily reset
>>its `fontified' text property after a change. `font-lock-after-change',
>>on the other hand, may refontify it provided `font-lock-lines-before' is
>>large enough.
>
>
> Please show me a test case.
>
>
Try
(defun foobar (bound)
(while (re-search-forward "\\<foo\\>" bound 'bound)
(save-excursion
(when (re-search-forward "\\<bar\\>" (line-end-position 2) 'lep)
(font-lock-prepend-text-property
(match-beginning 0) (match-end 0) 'face 'font-lock-warning-face)))))
(defun foobar-add ()
(interactive)
(font-lock-add-keywords nil '(foobar . nil) t))
In some buffer do `foobar-add', write "foo" on one line and "bar" on the
next. Plain font-lock will handle it, jit-lock won't.
>>However, I believe that `font-lock-lines-before' is a brute force
>>approach to handle such cases and could remarkably slow down editing if
>>it were honored by jit-lock mode. Multiline patterns are too delicate
>>and should be treated in a completely different way.
>
>
> Indeed, but nobody has put the work needed to handle them properly.
> font-lock-multiline is one hack, font-lock-lines-before is another,
> font-lock-fontification-face-function is yet another.
I don't know about font-lock-fontification-face-function.
`font-lock-multiline' is not a hack, at least not a priori. It simply
has not been developed yet. `font-lock-lines-before' is a brute hack.
However, until `font-lock-multiline' is implemented correctly, it might
be better than nothing.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
