> > screen. I was also trying to maintain backwards compatibility of > old > XLFDs, which I'm starting to think was unwise. I've made two > attempts at
> Regarding this, I think it would be good for people working on > Emacs.app, w32, and Xft to get together and try to figure out what to > do with the font-naming problem. It seems like the current use of > XLFD may benefit from an overhaul to adjust to the currently popular > font technologies. Even in X11, while XLFD is needed at the lowest level to interact with the windowing system, is it really necessary to expose the user to it? In the old days when emacs-X11 was first developed, X11 users were used to specifying fonts in ...-*-*-*-*-... fashion. Nowadays, most apps shield them from this. Thus, maybe it's reasonable to develop a new emacs font specification style that's simpler, and use this even in the face code until the lowest level where interaction w/the window system takes place? In most applications, users specify a font this way: string: family float: point size bool: bold bool: italic One question is how to deal with systems that allow more user control. For example, on OS X, some fonts have "semi-bold", "light", "condensed", and other versions. On X11, you can specify the DPI screen resolution the font is optimized for, and font pixel size instead of point size. The former situation could be handled using a fontspec like this: ("family-name" point-size (list-of-attributes)) Standard emacs faces would use just "bold" and "italic" as attributes, but users could use others specific to their systems, which the window system code would recognize. Unrecognized attributes are ignored or warned about. This approach might also handle X11 things like DPI resolution. For example, one attribute might be "75-dpi". Finally, a mechanism for ensuring some font family names are cross-platform would be needed. One approach here would be the time-honored "map standard postscript names to system-specific ones": each system would have a list of its equivalent families for "courier", "times", and so on. Another approach would be the web method of using generic names like 'sans', 'serif', and 'fixed' in all emacs standard faces. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel