Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Zhang Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The lisp/Makefile.in has been changed to regenerate >> mh-e/mh-loaddefs.el, but the corresponding lisp/makefile.w32-in remain >> unchanged. Is that ok? > > I was unaware of this file, sorry. > > I'll patch the file and check it in.
Done. Can someone please take care of verifying the change and implementing any "tricky bits" that Juanma mentioned? By the way, MH-E is known to run on Windows so this is a worthwhile exercise. I noticed a few discrepancies between Makefile.in and makefile.w32-in which may or may not be problems: 1. AUTOGENEL does not exist in makefile.w23-in, nor a maintainer-clean target which uses it. 2. compile depends on $(lisp)/subdirs.el in Makefile.in, subdirs.el in makefile.w32-in. 3. bootstrap in makefile.w32-in depends on "finder-data custom-deps" while boostrap in Makefile.in does not. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
