On 10/17/05, Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ken Manheimer wrote:
> >i like andrew zhilin's set of notebook icons very much, and think > >there are compelling reasons to go with them. > Indeed, I agree, they are nice in both 32x32 and bigger (though I think > there are other nice icons too). But is the 16x16 icon version > acceptable too? Can the 16x16 version be enhanced? (It is an important > icon size, at least on w32.) the 16x16 versions seem quite fine to me. (i meant to include the suggestions page url in my last message: http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/NewIcons.html - thanks for maintaining that.) the notebook representation in the large-scale versions will emphasize the text-editing connection, but the squiggle will be recognized across the different scales, and that sees to me to be the crucial thing. do you find the 16x16 version unclear, or too unconnected from the others in that set, or undistinctive from other common icons? those would be primary disqualifiers, once we agree that we like the design in general. ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
