Index: emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el
diff -c emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el:1.74 emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el:1.75
*** emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el:1.74 Wed Jun 1 05:07:06 2005
--- emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el Fri Jun 3 22:03:47 2005
***************
*** 367,374 ****
(or (nth 4 spec) 3)
(intern (format "gnus-emphasis-%s" (nth 2 spec)))))
types))
! '(("\\(\\s-\\|^\\)\\(-\\(\\(\\w\\|-[^-]\\)+\\)-\\)\\(\\s-\\|[?!.,;]\\)"
! 2 3 gnus-emphasis-strikethru)
("\\(\\s-\\|^\\)\\(_\\(\\(\\w\\|_[^_]\\)+\\)_\\)\\(\\s-\\|[?!.,;]\\)"
2 3 gnus-emphasis-underline))))
"*Alist that says how to fontify certain phrases.
--- 367,378 ----
(or (nth 4 spec) 3)
(intern (format "gnus-emphasis-%s" (nth 2 spec)))))
types))
! '(;; I've never seen anyone use this strikethru convention whereas I've
! ;; several times seen it triggered by normal text. --Stef
! ;; Miles suggests that this form is sometimes used but for italics,
! ;; so maybe we should map it to `italic'.
! ;;
("\\(\\s-\\|^\\)\\(-\\(\\(\\w\\|-[^-]\\)+\\)-\\)\\(\\s-\\|[?!.,;]\\)"
! ;; 2 3 gnus-emphasis-strikethru)
("\\(\\s-\\|^\\)\\(_\\(\\(\\w\\|_[^_]\\)+\\)_\\)\\(\\s-\\|[?!.,;]\\)"
2 3 gnus-emphasis-underline))))
"*Alist that says how to fontify certain phrases.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-diffs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-diffs
