monnier pushed a commit to branch master
in repository elpa.
commit 09fb4472e846a4c510df3ccf7e14ac10816f986d
Author: Teemu Likonen <[email protected]>
Date: Sat Jun 21 09:00:08 2014 +0300
Small README fixes
---
README.md | 15 +++++++--------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 0d5548d..87b1784 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -55,13 +55,12 @@ or (2) executing interactive command `wcheck-actions` while
the cursor
(the point) is on a marked text.
If you use Wcheck mode as a spelling checker then it's natural to
-configure an action menu that offers spelling suggestions for the
-misspelled word. The action menu could also have an option to add the
-marked word to spell-checker's dictionary, so that the word is
-recognized in the future. That's only one application for Wcheck mode,
-though. Wcheck mode can be configured to find almost any kind of text
-elements from buffer, mark them, and offer any kind of actions for
-marked text.
+configure an action menu that offers spelling suggestions for misspelled
+words. The action menu could also have an option to add marked word to
+spell-checker's dictionary, so that the word is recognized in the
+future. That's only one application for Wcheck mode, though. Wcheck mode
+can be configured to find almost any kind of text elements from buffer,
+mark them, and offer any kind of actions for marked text.
How does it compare to other spell-checkers?
@@ -178,7 +177,7 @@ actions (spelling suggestions) menu for user.
("Finnish"
(program . "/usr/bin/enchant")
- (args "-l" "-d" "fi")
+ (args "-l" "-d" "fi")
(syntax . my-finnish-syntax-table)
(action-program . "/usr/bin/enchant")
(action-args "-a" "-d" "fi")
