branch: externals/jinx
commit 05c172ea8509d493eb373d71c2c6fa46caee96f5
Author: Daniel Mendler <[email protected]>
Commit: GitHub <[email protected]>
Update README.org
---
README.org | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.org b/README.org
index 9925322bd0..c13d96c0d9 100644
--- a/README.org
+++ b/README.org
@@ -168,9 +168,8 @@ following three alternative packages come closest to the
behavior of Jinx.
- [[https://github.com/astoff/jit-spell][jit-spell]]: Jinx UI borrows ideas
from Augusto Stoffel's Jit-spell. Jit-spell
uses the less efficient Ispell process communication instead Jinx's calling
- native API. Since Jit-spell highlights misspellings in the entire buffer and
- does not confine to just the visible text, Jit-spell affected load and
latency
- negatively in my tests
([[https://github.com/astoff/jit-spell/issues/9][issue on Github]]).
+ a native API. Since Jit-spell does not restrict spell checking to the
visible text only, it may enqueue the entire buffer too eagerly for checking.
This can happen when scrolling around or when stealth font locking is enabled.
For this reason, Jit-spell affected load and latency
+ in my tests ([[https://github.com/astoff/jit-spell/issues/9][issue on
Github]]).
- [[https://codeberg.org/ideasman42/emacs-spell-fu][spell-fu]]: The idea to
check words just in the visible text came from Campbell
Barton's spell-fu package. Spell-fu is fast but incurs high memory overhead
on
