branch: elpa/paredit
commit 73e664e0fe2e7b7fa8b80f6833a2a27afa897b1e
Author: Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]>
Commit: Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]>
Add test for C-u ( with trailing comment and no trailing newline.
Ignore-this: b8c951ba61e9e05e5f77c90e96353e23
Add comments about why these tests are slightly bogus.
darcs-hash:20110409200825-00fcc-8ae65e3261bd36c970424a3dd88e07cb925a5044
---
test.el | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/test.el b/test.el
index 62f8f61..e625175 100644
--- a/test.el
+++ b/test.el
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ Four arguments: the paredit command, the text of the buffer
"(x (| ;y\n z)\n w)"))))
(let ((current-prefix-arg '(4)))
+ ;++ Oops -- `C-u (' is like `M-4 (', not like `C-u M-('.
(paredit-test-bracketed '((paredit-open-round ?\( ?\))
(paredit-open-square ?\[ ?\])
(paredit-open-curly ?\{ ?\})
@@ -117,7 +118,10 @@ Four arguments: the paredit command, the text of the buffer
("(x |;y\n z\n w)"
"(x (| ;y\n z\n w))")
("foo |bar baz" "foo (|bar baz)")
- ("foo\n|bar\nbaz\n;quux\n" "foo\n(|bar\n baz)\n;quux\n"))))
+ ;++ These tests are kinda bunk. It's not immediately clear to me
+ ;++ which is right: including or excluding the trailing comment.
+ ("foo\n|bar\nbaz\n;quux\n" "foo\n(|bar\n baz)\n;quux\n")
+ ("foo\n|bar\nbaz\n;; quux" "foo\n(|bar\n baz\n ;; quux\n )"))))
(paredit-test-bracketed '((paredit-close-round ?\( ?\))
(paredit-close-square ?\[ ?\])
