branch: elpa/paredit
commit 4800e25a741198a6b1758cf6b17f8ed89552bebb
Author: Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]>
Commit: Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]>
Use `let*' rather than `let' in `paredit-indent-sexps'.
Ignore-this: 18cf22cb9511351b0d547a2337357c96
There is no semantic difference here in elisp, since elisp guarantees
left-to-right evaluation order in `let', but using `let*' makes it
clearer that there is an intended ordering dependency.
darcs-hash:20110323043646-00fcc-fddfd7cf6d1d67eea90fa03627a510d7c82432b4
---
paredit.el | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/paredit.el b/paredit.el
index 76e16bb..01aacb3 100644
--- a/paredit.el
+++ b/paredit.el
@@ -2459,8 +2459,8 @@ Assumes that `paredit-in-string-p' is false, so that it
need not handle
(defun paredit-indent-sexps ()
"If in a list, indent all following S-expressions in the list."
- (let ((start (point))
- (end (paredit-handle-sexp-errors (progn (up-list) (point)) nil)))
+ (let* ((start (point))
+ (end (paredit-handle-sexp-errors (progn (up-list) (point)) nil)))
(if end
(indent-region start end))))
