branch: elpa/with-editor
commit 8e0c358c94f3649ec122fd03f5c8bc4602dce611
Author: Jonas Bernoulli <jo...@bernoul.li>
Commit: Jonas Bernoulli <jo...@bernoul.li>
with-editor-set-process-filter: Fix documentation
---
with-editor.el | 6 +++---
with-editor.org | 5 +++--
with-editor.texi | 5 +++--
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/with-editor.el b/with-editor.el
index 751133f..4a43595 100644
--- a/with-editor.el
+++ b/with-editor.el
@@ -628,9 +628,9 @@ Give PROCESS the new FILTER but keep
`with-editor-process-filter'
if that was added earlier by the advised `start-file-process'.
Do so by wrapping the two filter functions using a lambda, which
-becomes the actual filter. It calls `with-editor-process-filter'
-first, passing t as NO-STANDARD-FILTER. Then it calls FILTER,
-which may or may not insert the text into the PROCESS's buffer."
+becomes the actual filter. It calls FILTER first, which may or
+may not insert the text into the PROCESS's buffer. Then it calls
+`with-editor-process-filter', passing t as NO-STANDARD-FILTER."
(set-process-filter
process
(if (eq (process-filter process) 'with-editor-process-filter)
diff --git a/with-editor.org b/with-editor.org
index 7686dd9..106205f 100644
--- a/with-editor.org
+++ b/with-editor.org
@@ -268,8 +268,9 @@ package]].
This function is like ~set-process-filter~ but ensures that adding the
new FILTER does not remove the ~with-editor-process-filter~. This is
done by wrapping the two filter functions using a lambda, which
- becomes the actual filter. It calls ~with-editor-process-filter~
- first, passing ~t~ as NO-STANDARD-FILTER. Then it calls FILTER.
+ becomes the actual filter. It calls FILTER first, which may or
+ may not insert the text into the PROCESS's buffer. Then it calls
+ ~with-editor-process-filter~, passing t as NO-STANDARD-FILTER.
* Debugging
diff --git a/with-editor.texi b/with-editor.texi
index afdf587..73c89f6 100644
--- a/with-editor.texi
+++ b/with-editor.texi
@@ -341,8 +341,9 @@ required and that it is evaluated at run-time.
This function is like @code{set-process-filter} but ensures that adding the
new FILTER does not remove the @code{with-editor-process-filter}. This is
done by wrapping the two filter functions using a lambda, which
-becomes the actual filter. It calls @code{with-editor-process-filter}
-first, passing @code{t} as NO-STANDARD-FILTER@. Then it calls FILTER@.
+becomes the actual filter. It calls FILTER first, which may or
+may not insert the text into the PROCESS's buffer. Then it calls
+@code{with-editor-process-filter}, passing t as NO-STANDARD-FILTER@.
@end defun
@node Debugging
