branch: elpa/multiple-cursors
commit 7f255ce69603de084d25f615b8556c093cce906b
Author: Leo Gaskin <[email protected]>
Commit: Magnar Sveen <[email protected]>

    Remove notes saying that "M-x" isn't properly supported
---
 README.md           | 5 -----
 multiple-cursors.el | 1 -
 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 09be689d37..1fb8c3c5e5 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -67,10 +67,6 @@ To get out of multiple-cursors-mode, press `<return>` or 
`C-g`. The latter will
 first disable multiple regions before disabling multiple cursors. If you want 
to
 insert a newline in multiple-cursors-mode, use `C-j`.
 
-## Important note
-
-Multiple cursors does not do well when you invoke its commands with `M-x`. It 
needs to be bound to keys to work properly. Pull request to fix this is welcome.
-
 ## Video
 
 You can [watch an intro to multiple-cursors at Emacs 
Rocks](http://emacsrocks.com/e13.html).
@@ -204,7 +200,6 @@ run once to `mc/cmds-to-run-once` in ".mc-lists.el".
 
 * isearch-forward and isearch-backward aren't supported with multiple cursors.
   If you want this functionality, you can use 
[phi-search](https://github.com/zk-phi/phi-search).
-* Commands run with `M-x` won't be repeated for all cursors.
 * All key bindings that refer to lambdas are always run for all cursors. If you
   need to limit it, you will have to give it a name.
 * Redo might screw with your cursors. Undo works very well.
diff --git a/multiple-cursors.el b/multiple-cursors.el
index 22430a5d4b..8c3e14814e 100644
--- a/multiple-cursors.el
+++ b/multiple-cursors.el
@@ -153,7 +153,6 @@
 
 ;; * isearch-forward and isearch-backward aren't supported with multiple 
cursors.
 ;;   You should feel free to add a simplified version that can work with it.
-;; * Commands run with `M-x` won't be repeated for all cursors.
 ;; * All key bindings that refer to lambdas are always run for all cursors. If 
you
 ;;   need to limit it, you will have to give it a name.
 ;; * Redo might screw with your cursors. Undo works very well.

Reply via email to