"Xavier Maillard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was looking on emacswiki searching for publish engines for > Emacs. Actually, I have found at least three of them: > > 1. muse > 2. emacs-wiki > 3. bhl
Since you mentionned BHL, let me talk a bit about it. BHL is quite *old* and buggy - it was my first elisp attempt and it grew up into something too complicated. Additionnally, BHL support for the Wiki behavior is not as good as muse's one, so i would only recommand to use BHL for single document. And since BHL is a tool for *exporting* files (not publishing them), this wiki behavior isn't necessary anymore. In a (no so) near future, i plan to rewrite BHL so it concentrates on some functionnalities that are not muse priorities. For instance, i'd like BHL to implement a way of inserting readable bibtex references (working with reftex), indexes and footnotes. BHL should also remain a tool for creating human-readable files, excluding any form of explicit markup. -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
