in that case, could you pass the LaTeX through into the HTML as
an HTML comment?
It "future proofs" things, and also creates HTML files that have
better information than black and white dots ---
>>>>> "Carsten" == Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carsten> On Jun 25, 2006, at 13:30, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> However, the tex4ht output is definitely much better than
>> plain text representations, and yes, you can have them
>> read to you by a program.
>>
>> I will make this configurable and allow something like
>> tex4ht. Thanks for pointing me to it.
Carsten>
Carsten> I have lowered the priority on this item. After
Carsten> playing with MathML and tex4ht, and lot of trouble
Carsten> with getting MathML displayed in browsers, I don't
Carsten> think this route is viable for the moment. And
Carsten> since displaying equations was the main (even the
Carsten> only) driver for embedded LaTeX in org-mode, I am
Carsten> sticking with images for the time being.
Carsten>
Carsten> - Carsten
--
Best Regards,
--raman
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
AIM: emacspeak GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Google: tv+raman
IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
