Hi Eddward

Does this do what you want?

* wealth management
|--------------------------+---------+---------|
| item                     |  amount | balance |
|--------------------------+---------+---------|
| paid                     |   50.00 |   50.00 |
| baby's new part of shoes |  -25.00 |   25.00 |
| chip                     |   -2.50 |   22.50 |
| my birthday!             |  100.00 |  122.50 |
| speeding fine :(         | -200.00 |  -77.50 |
|--------------------------+---------+---------|
#+TBLFM: $3=vsum(@-I$-1..$-1);f2

By explicitly doing the summation, I avoid any dependence on the order
in which each row is calculated. I think that your version fails
because your formula makes no sense for the first row: you can't add a
string ("total") to a float (50.00).

Cheers

Will

On 6/5/07, Eddward DeVilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,

    I'm having trouble trying to figure out what I've got wrong here.
Given the table

* wealth management
  |--------------------------+--------+-------|
  | item                     | amount | total |
  |--------------------------+--------+-------|
  | paid                     |  50.00 |       |
  | baby's new part of shoes | -25.00 |       |
  | chip                     |  -2.50 |       |
  |--------------------------+--------+-------|
#+TBLFM: $3='(+ @-1 $-1)


I would expect to get the results

* wealth management
  |--------------------------+--------+-------|
  | item                     | amount | total |
  |--------------------------+--------+-------|
  | paid                     |  50.00 | 50.00 |
  | baby's new part of shoes | -25.00 | 25.00 |
  | chip                     |  -2.50 | 22.50 |
  |--------------------------+--------+-------|
#+TBLFM: $3='(+ @-1 $-1)


But instead I just get

* wealth management
  |--------------------------+--------+--------|
  | item                     | amount | total  |
  |--------------------------+--------+--------|
  | paid                     |  50.00 | #ERROR |
  | baby's new part of shoes | -25.00 | #ERROR |
  | chip                     |  -2.50 | #ERROR |
  |--------------------------+--------+--------|
#+TBLFM: $3='(+ @-1 $-1)


I'm sure I'm missing something.  Is a table like this even possible?

Edd


_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode



--

 Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica,
 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia


_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to