Carsten Dominik <dominik <at> science.uva.nl> writes:
> I cannot reproduce the indentation you are getting - are you
> re-indenting the lines
> with TAB or so?
In fact what happens is that any CLOCK below another one that has a note is
indented more than the CLOCK above it:
Eg (from a real org-mode file this time)
CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 14:36]--[2007-10-03 qua 14:40] => 0:04
- Updating wiki about mlc.
CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 13:28]--[2007-10-03 qua 14:36] => 1:08
- Debugging mlc.
CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 11:46]--[2007-10-03 qua 12:10] => 0:24
This also means that any body text underneath the clocks will be indented
differently depending on whether there are notes to the clocks.
> > and the useful information about the subtask is in
> > danger of being swamped by a mass of reverse-ordered progress logs.
>
> Actually, I have been bothered by that too. Maybe we should have
> a special CLOCK drawer and make all those entries go in there....
Yes, that would make sense. I thought about it but then decided I didn't like
the idea of having drawers for all the subtasks - as if that would be noisier
than having lots of CLOCK entries in all the subtasks!
I'll try tweaking the clock-out function to put completed clocks into a drawer,
and see how I like it.
Cheers,
Tom SW.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
