On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:53:47PM +0100, Bastien wrote: > Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm curious about your suggestion of '<<' though - does that imply the > > sub-keymap functionality I asked for already exists? > > I first thought yes, since it looks like the first `<' keystroke is > waiting for the next one (at least from the description I proposed). > > But in fact there is no sub-keymap involved here: it's only about > cycling through three states: > > - not-restricted > - buffer-restricted > - subtree/region-resctricted > > Then three keystrokes would turn off the restriction. > > But calling a sub-keymap with `<' could also be useful: > > `< <' : cycle through default restricted states (see above)
Hmm, that doubles the number of keypresses to achieve a given state, which is a bit cumbersome. But if it's customizable, who cares? :-) _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
