Mike Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that class is the right thing here. We are saying that this is
> a "table-of-contents" rather than this is the "table-of-contents". I
> believe at present there is no mechanism to give more than one table of
> contents, but someone, sometime might want tables of contents for
> individual sections of a document.
Fair enough. Let's say that "id" is okay for now (since the HTML
exporter doesn't know how to export multiple tables of contents),
but this might become "class" when needed.
> This appears to be logical, but is in fact (I think) redundant. We can
> specify the style to applied at different levels without using
> class attributes. For example:
>
> div { background-color: lightgray}
> div > div { background-color: peachpuff}
> div > div > div { background-color: green}
>
> shows how different styling can be applied to level 1, level 2 and
> level 3 (and above).
So you suggest keeping the <div> tags, but stripping them out of their
"class" attributes?
> I think this has advantages (e.g. inheritance of unspecified
> characteristics from higher levels) and leaves the class attribute
> free to represent styling that is independent of the structure.
Yes, I feel quite the same.
--
Bastien
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
