> Shouldn't they be `&endash;' and `&emdash;' in HTML? > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/dtds.html#a_dtd_Symbols >
You mean – and — – and — for -- and --- respectively is ok. I think there exist no ---- and ----- ­ with \- and with ~ are also good... There exists also ​ (zero-width space), but that's not a sign for breaking words into syllables; ­ is in addition better implemented. That means that following signs: \- ~ -- --- would have a special meaning when being exported on all org documents. I don't know if ~ is a good election. It should be looked for inside of words (li~ke this), but probably excluding URLs. Maybe that causes more problems to the users who want to write a literal ~. The symbol for „breaking allowed" could also be \~ ... That's an inconsistency with LaTeX ~, but is consistent with LaTeX's \- And that would leave ~ untouched and just use \- and \~ for hyphenation. Greets, Daniel _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
