>>>>> Carsten Dominik writes:
> On 13Nov2007, at 12:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
>>> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
>>> easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
>>>
>>> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
>>> still worth supporting it....
>>>
>>>
>>> - Carsten
>>>
>>
>> If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
>> is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
>> into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
> Well, the fact that it is in Emacs CVS has not kept me from
> supporting XEmacs for quite a while now. But it is extra work and
> requires catering for missing features and different implementations
> - so it is important for me to know that this is used and still
> appreciated.
> How about someone stepping forward and trying to release an XEmacs
> package containing noutline.el and org-mode? Anyone who feels up to
> this? Because I will not have the time.
I'm already maintaing XEmacs for cygwin. I will give it a try and ask on
the XEmacs list how to proceed. At least I will release an org-mode
package with the xemacs-sumo on cygwin.
> - Carsten
Ciao
Volker
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
